One Unknown

The semblance hypothesis has identified multiple lines of indirect evidence supporting the plausibility of the IPL mechanism (see Evidence page). However, no studies have yet investigated inter-neuronal inter-spine interactions with the specific aim to test for the presence of IPLs. The IPL mechanism consists of inter-dendritic branch inter-spine interactions between spines, mainly belonging to different neurons. Most likely, it involves a spectrum of mechanisms. They can be tested as follows.

1. Simultaneous dual-nanopipette recording from abutted dendritic spines in animals. In awake, behaviourally responsive non-human primates or rodents, two flexible quartz nanopipettes (tip diameters 15–30 nm, spring constant ∼0.08 N/m) coated with quantum dots for two-photon visualization can be independently positioned under visual guidance onto two abutted dendritic spines [1-3]. A gentle touch-and-buzz electroporation protocol is then applied to each pipette to gain intracellular access to each spine head, enabling simultaneous dual recording from both spines [1, 4, 5]. The prediction is that within a 5–20 ms co-activation window, spontaneous or evoked activity in spine A will produce a subthreshold depolarization in spine B with short, fixed latency. Following recording, distinct fluorescent dyes can be injected through each nanopipette into the respective spine heads and allow to diffuse throughout the parent neuron, after which whole-neuron imaging can be performed to verify if the two spines belong to different neurons. Reproducible transfer significantly above control conditions constitute direct evidence for IPLs; falsification requires its absence across a minimum of 50 confirmed inter-neuronal abutted spine pairs. If recordings suggestive of the presence of IPL are present, extracellular spacing can be transiently increased by focal application of hyperosmotic mannitol-based ACSF through a nearby micropipette under two-photon guidance, while neuronal firing rates and membrane excitability are monitored to verify that any change in transfer probability reflects IPL disruption rather than generalized excitability change. The transfer probability and/or amplitude are expected to markedly decrease during extracellular expansion and recovers following washout.

2. Another possible mechanism is localized electrical field that can form between inter-LINKed spines. Given that extracellular potentials can influence nearby neuronal membranes through ephaptic coupling [6, 7], and that abutted spines at IPL-eligible sites are separated by as little as 10–30 nm of extracellular space [8, 9], it is possible to infer that such fields could permit highly reversible, rapid voltage transfer between spine heads without persistent structural change.

3. Experimental data suggest that AMPA receptor subunit-containing vesicles with small diameters fuse with spine membrane due to VAMP2 [10]. In addition to delivering AMPA receptor subunit to the postsynaptic membrane [11], this serves another purpose. The vesicles membranes get incorporated with the lateral spine membrane regions of spines to cause regional spine enlargement. The extent of LTP induction correlates with the ability to learn and can be explained in terms of IPL formation [12].

4. Another testable mechanism involves redox-mediated inter-spine bridging. When spines get abutted more closely (e.g., due to spine expansion by released dopamine [13], redox-active amino acids such as C103 of VAMP2 from two abutted spines become exposed to the aqueous extracellular medium. When synaptic activity induces local oxygen depletion [14], this along with the release of metal ions like Zn²⁺ into the extrasynaptic space [15], can facilitate the formation of metal complexes [16] that bridge the spines and facilitate voltage transfer.

5. Postsynaptic SNARE proteins are essential for activity-dependent membrane remodeling at dendritic spine margins [17], affecting membrane tension, curvature, and lipid organization, and bringing abutted spines closer together. SNARE proteins overcome curvature-induced energy barriers, thereby initiating hemifusion [18]. SNAREs also generate force to tightly appose membranes [19], forming characteristic hemifusion intermediates [20]. SNARE-mediated fusion of AMPA receptor-containing vesicles with the spine membrane [21] potentially contributes membrane material to lateral spine regions. Based on the semblance hypothesis, SNARE proteins play a key role in IPL formation during LTP induction by repurposing fusion machinery to facilitate inter-spine interactions [12]. During heightened synaptic activity, this may allow for transient hemifusion or restricted membrane continuity between abutted postsynaptic membranes, that stops short of full fusion. 

6. While conducting the above experiments, it is essential to examine whether a reversible, distance-dependent inter-spine voltage transfer mechanism can be demonstrated that cannot be adequately explained by known dendritic physiology, recurrent collateral activity, or long-range corticothalamic and thalamocortical connectivity.

References

[1]   Jayant K, Hirtz JJ, Plante IJ, Tsai D, de Boer WD, Semonche A, Peterka DS, Owen JS, Sahin O, Shepard KL, Yuste R. Targeted intracellular voltage recordings from dendritic spines using quantum-dot-coated nanopipettes. Nat Nanotechnol. 2017;12(4):335-342. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2016.268 

[2]   Jayant K, Wenzel M, Bando Y, Hamm JP, Mandriota N, Rabinowitz JH, Plante IJ, Owen JS, Sahin O, Shepard KL, Yuste R. Flexible Nanopipettes for Minimally Invasive Intracellular Electrophysiology In Vivo. Cell Rep. 2019;26(1):266-278.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.12.019 

[3]   Koçun C, et al. Nanopipette fabrication for intracellular recording. J Vis Exp. 2012;(66):e3885. https://doi.org/10.3791/3885

[4]   Palmer LM, Stuart GJ. Membrane potential changes in dendritic spines during action potentials and synaptic input. J Neurosci. 2009;29(21):6897-6904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0758-09.2009 

[5]   Tønnesen J, Nägerl UV. Dendritic spines as tunable regulators of synaptic signals. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2016;36:87-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2015.10.011 

[6]   Anastassiou CA, Perin R, Markram H, Koch C. Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons. Nature Neuroscience. 2011; 14: 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2727

[7]   Fröhlich F, McCormick DA. Endogenous electric fields may guide neocortical network activity. Neuron. 2010; 67: 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.06.005

[8]   Kasthuri N, Hayworth KJ, Berger DR, Schalek RL, Conchello JA, Knowles-Barley S, et al. Saturated reconstruction of a volume of neocortex. Cell. 2015; 162: 648–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.054

[9]   Tønnesen J, Inavalli VVGK, Nägerl UV. Super-resolution imaging of the extracellular space in living brain tissue. Cell. 2018; 172: 1108–1121.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.007

[10] Peters JJ, Leitz J, Oses-Prieto JA, Burlingame AL, Brunger AT. Molecular characterization of AMPA-receptor-containing vesicles. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience. 2021; 14: 754631. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2021.754631

[11] Penn AC, Zhang CL, Georges F, Royer L, Breillat C, Hosy E, et al. Hippocampal LTP and contextual learning require surface diffusion of AMPA receptors. Nature. 2017; 549: 384–388. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23658

[12] Vadakkan KI. A potential mechanism for first-person internal sensation of memory provides evidence for the relationship between learning and LTP induction. Behavioural Brain Research. 2019; 360: 16–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2018.11.038

[13]  Yagishita S, Hayashi-Takagi A, Ellis-Davies GCR, Urakubo H, Ishii S, Kasai H. A critical time window for dopamine actions on the structural plasticity of dendritic spines. Science. 2014; 345: 1616–1620. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255514

[14] Foster KA, Beaver CJ, Turner DA. Interaction between tissue oxygen tension and NADH imaging during synaptic stimulation and hypoxia in rat hippocampal slices. Neuroscience. 2005; 132: 645–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.01.040

[15] Bizup B, Tzounopoulos T. On the genesis and unique functions of zinc neuromodulation. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2024; 132: 1241–1254. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00285.2024.

[16] Go YM, Chandler JD, Jones DP. The cysteine proteome. Free Radical Biology & Medicine. 2015; 84: 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.03.022

[17] Lledo PM, Zhang X, Südhof TC, Malenka RC, Nicoll RA. Postsynaptic membrane fusion and long-term potentiation. Science. 1998; 279: 399–403. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5349.399.

[18] Hernandez JM, Stein A, Behrmann E, Riedel D, Cypionka A, Farsi Z, et al. Membrane fusion intermediates via directional and full assembly of the SNARE complex. Science. 2012; 336: 1581–1584. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1221976

[19] Jahn R, Scheller RH. SNAREs--engines for membrane fusion. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2006; 7: 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2002

[20] Liu T, Wang T, Chapman ER, Weisshaar JC. Productive hemifusion intermediates in fast vesicle fusion driven by neuronal SNAREs. Biophysical Journal. 2008; 94: 1303–1314. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.107896

[21] Kennedy MJ, Davison IG, Robinson CG, Ehlers MD. Syntaxin-4 defines a domain for activity-dependent exocytosis in dendritic spines. Cell. 2010[KV1] ; 141: 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.042